Comments on: Science mag: Breakthrough of the year http://wastedmonkeys.com/science-mag-breakthrough-of-the-year/ Tue, 26 Dec 2006 12:38:08 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.3.2 By: Karthi http://wastedmonkeys.com/science-mag-breakthrough-of-the-year/#comment-44 Tue, 26 Dec 2006 12:38:08 +0000 http://wastedmonkeys.com/2006/12/22/science-mag-breakthrough-of-the-year/#comment-44 Deep down I also think the same way.
But there are few Chinese mathematicians who say that Grigori started it, and it is they who finished the proof.

I am all confused on the meaning of “Proof”!

]]> By: Saket Rungta http://wastedmonkeys.com/science-mag-breakthrough-of-the-year/#comment-43 Fri, 22 Dec 2006 12:45:47 +0000 http://wastedmonkeys.com/2006/12/22/science-mag-breakthrough-of-the-year/#comment-43 Since I have no reason to believe Grigori Perelman didn’t solve it, I accept he did! What do you think?

]]> By: Karthi http://wastedmonkeys.com/science-mag-breakthrough-of-the-year/#comment-42 Fri, 22 Dec 2006 10:40:45 +0000 http://wastedmonkeys.com/2006/12/22/science-mag-breakthrough-of-the-year/#comment-42 The dust of controversy on who actually solved Poincaré conjecture hasn’t settled yet or has it?

]]>